Start Submission

Reading: The Aesthetic Experience of Kandinsky’s Abstract Art: A Polemic with Henry’s Phenomenologica...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research Article

The Aesthetic Experience of Kandinsky’s Abstract Art: A Polemic with Henry’s Phenomenological Analysis

Author:

Anna Ziółkowska-Juś

Department of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89C, 60-568 Poznań, PL
X close

Abstract

The French phenomenologist Michel Henry sees a similarity between the primordial experience of what he calls ‘Life’ and the aesthetic experience occasioned by Wassily Kandinsky’s abstract art. The triple aim of this essay is to explain and assess (1) how Henry interprets Kandinsky’s abstract art and theory; (2) what the consequences of his interpretation mean for the theory of the experience of abstract art; and (3) what doubts and questions emerge from Henry’s interpretations of Kandinsky’s theory and practice. Despite its containing many interesting ideas, Henry’s phenomenological approach is insufficient to describe the aesthetic experience of Kandinsky’s abstract art. For Henry, aesthetic experience is corporeal, primordial, non-intentional, and independent of knowledge and culture. By contrast, I believe that it is possible and more suitable to connect the direct, corporeal, and affective character of the aesthetic experience of abstract art with intentionality and embeddedness in culture and knowledge.
How to Cite: Ziółkowska-Juś, Anna. “The Aesthetic Experience of Kandinsky’s Abstract Art: A Polemic with Henry’s Phenomenological Analysis”. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics 54, no. 2 (2017): 212–37. DOI: http://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.164
2
Views
2
Downloads
Published on 01 Sep 2017.
Peer Reviewed

Downloads

  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus