Start Submission

Reading: On the Seeming Incompatibility Between Poetry and Philosophy


A- A+
Alt. Display

Research Article

On the Seeming Incompatibility Between Poetry and Philosophy


Karen Simecek

Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, GB
X close


Poetry as a mode of philosophizing can reasonably be considered a failure when making the following moves: from the experientially particular to general content (by means of abstract thought); from ordinary pre-reflective thinking (a contingent thought someone happened to have) to philosophically rigorous thought (which is rationally grounded); from domestic conceptions (connections of thought made by individual readers) to public conceptions (why these connections are relevant to our general, collective understanding). These problems arise when trying to meet the three main requirements of philosophical inquiry: generality, rationality, and justification. In order to show that the thinking involved in reading a poem is akin to the thinking involved in philosophical inquiry, poetry must make the right kind of moves in thought and meet these fundamental philosophical demands. In this article, the author offers a defence of the view that poetry can make a significant and valuable contribution to philosophical inquiry when faced with these three problems.
How to Cite: Simecek, Karen. “On the Seeming Incompatibility Between Poetry and Philosophy”. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics 50, no. 1 (2013): 27–40. DOI:
Published on 15 May 2013.
Peer Reviewed


  • PDF (EN)

    comments powered by Disqus